The addressee and beneficiary of the policy, including social and demographic PiS, is to be first and foremost a family, not the individual. It has different effects which are hardly good, eg., That money does not get a lot of poor people, and get a better off family – says PAP Ryszard Bugaj.
Ultimately, 500+ cost of the program is approx. 22 billion dollars a year – recalled Bugaj, who is an economist, prof. YOU. In his opinion, this and much and little. – In spite of all this, however, a little more than 1 percent. GDP. And besides, European standards are even higher social spending and demographic there are several times higher – pointed.
According to Bugaj “in principle” should take a chance on such big money for pro-natalist and at the same time increase revenues Poles. – This should be done even without a guarantee of success. You have to take a chance. But the adopted formula is quite controversial and may cause inefficiency, injustice and PiS will bring many new critics in the long run – he stressed.
I continued: – There will be side effects. Because people will be much richer, who will get the money, and much poorer people who do not get. But in this formula support, he suggested the PiS, is inevitable. Other ideas on how to distribute them, are even worse. For example, the idea of mass-do tests profitable. Income test is very expensive and would absorb a large part of those 22 billion dollars per year planned for the program 500+. Besides this test and this is largely uncertain and could be ineffective. I heard that only Marek Borowski reported an interesting alternative, which anyway has drawbacks: first child 250 per month, for another more appropriately. “
– The government says it is not a social program, only demographic it is an investment in the future. to me it seems that it is the program, and such and such. do not underestimate the fact that, for example. in some families with many children can improve the situation of children. that would certainly effect social. As for demographics – generally my opinion is that the demographic problems should be solved in the form of direct grants for children, but not in this form, but a variety of benefits. for example, can the money to give to schools to organize various tours, activities for children, financed meals etc. money can would also be spent on solving housing problems – said prof. Bugaj.
In his view, the decision of Justice of such, and not another formula, are facing issues of ideological and political.
– This causes the PiS supporters, but also opponents. PiS is conservative, or at least they want to show themselves as conservatives. Therefore, the addressee and beneficiary of the policy, including social and demographic, to be first and foremost a family, not the individual. This has various consequences, in my opinion, is unlikely to be good consequences, for example, it was such that the money does not get a lot of poor people, and get a better off family – concluded Bugaj.
PAP
No comments:
Post a Comment