the
the first Reason: a trap for the boss
first and most importantly, the Fund has become a trap for employers. On the one hand, he condemned them for trying to gather information from employees about income in the family. On the other-requires that social assistance was addicted to “from life situations, family and material holder of the Fund” (article 8 of the law on the social Fund ). If it was a paper law. Unfortunately, fisk and welfare extremely readily to be traced. I know numerous examples of companies for which years later came the inspectors and demanded overdue payments from rest under gruszą just because all workers received additional payments for leave equally. It’s not just about ZUS talking. If benefits were the same, then the game takes the tax and requires the unpaid amount of tax. He believes that because the benefit does not depend on “the situation of life, family and material”, has not been paid in accordance with the law ” about Fund of social . T o read – it was not made a condition of his parole, referred to in article 21, part 1, p. 67 of the law on personal income tax.
>>> see also: “Auchan” forcing employees to Declaration about 500 plus. Under threat of dismissal.
source: Law journal
the second Reason: no personal income tax benefits
What sense reglamentowania – tax laws and składkowym – social benefits for employees, as many other benefits, niewypłacanych from the social Fund , only current assets, the company generally is not subject to tax? It was not so legible, dated 8 July 2014. Since then, however, as was the verdict of the constitutional Court, many benefits have appeared without taxes and social insurance contributions. Why keep it a fantasy in which employees objadający at a corporate meeting or production of the vigil have no income, and was hired, who received a modest parcel for Christmas, has to pay personal income tax only because the same was received by the colleague from the next table?
the third Reason: cancellation due to
social Benefits not by taxes, but this is a copy of the social Fund . Isn’t it better then to destroy this entire Foundation and contributions to it, and instead allow the employer to calculate bonus payments to the tax expenses? Since wage is the price, why not be the social benefits? Who can, let give. Shouldn’t I act the same indicator that every other expense that is connected with the source of income? The relationship with profit is the amount is irrelevant – has no price.
Reason four: lunch for less
this is even more evident in a situation where we allow entrepreneurs to count down from income of expenses on Lunches and dinners with clients. The possibility of such a deduction are convinced both courts (sentencing NSA June 17, 2013), as the Minister of Finance (interpretation places from 25 November 2013).
the fifth Reason: it is a relic of
of course, there are many opponents who will argue that social benefit is taking over the world and work in many civilized countries, it is inconceivable that they didn’t hire got a discount on lunch in the canteen or gift from the chef under the Christmas tree. Perfectly aware of this. However, in these countries, the workers perform their duties under a trust agreement or monthly bill the “employer”? Patient the situation on the Polish labour market has meant that sitting at the same table with people today, one of which uses the social gains and the other doesn’t, despite the fact that at the same time, they both perform virtually the same duties under the same management. Leave for another likeness. ⒸⓅ
>>> see also: Minister intervenes Rafalsky ws. the network “Auchan”. Will be a test of labour inspectors
No comments:
Post a Comment