Moreover, as we said Slawomir Broniarz PNA president, president-elect also pledged that it will refer the request to the Constitutional Court to examine the compatibility of Art. 5 paragraph. 5g, Art. 7 paragraph. 1, Art. 17 paragraph. 4 and Art. 58 paragraph. 3 of the Act of September 7, 1991. System of Education (Journal of Laws of 2004 no. 256, item. 2572, as amended.) With the Basic Law.
These provisions give local governments the ability to transfer schools to private entities, including for example. communal associations or companies. In the opinion of the association such action infringes Article. 70 sec. 3 first sentence of the Constitution, ie free access to public schools run by local governments.
Union already such a proposal comprised the tribunal, but it was not acted upon. Tribunal found that the PNA has no legal interest. In turn, local governments indicate that, by providing school associations or municipal companies do not have to get rid of implementing educational tasks, but rationally manage education.
– I think it is better for teachers that have a job the Association school where they are employed under the labor code, rather than stick to the card and power the ranks of the unemployed – indicates Krystyna Mikołajczuk-Bohowicz, Mayor Repki (province. Mazowieckie).
According to her trade unionists depends solely on the fact that only governments ran schools, because only in such institutions used the privileges of the card.
– And associating school continues to be public and free of charge. For parents and students nothing changes – he added.
The idea of maintaining the card from a distance comes the Ministry of Education, whose current chief says her successor (in October parliamentary elections will be held) should begin his tenure from the liquidation of this document and write a new law on the teaching profession. In turn, the experts emphasize that if in power to continue the current coalition, the future president will be hard to block changes to the tab.
– Trade unions need to remember that the president may veto the bill at most, that and so ultimately may go by the Sejm, or, for example. send it to the Constitutional Court. Certainly not completely block changes to the card, if it be the will of the government – said Dr Magdalena Zwolińska, an attorney with the law firm DLA Piper Wiater sp. K.
No comments:
Post a Comment