the Minister in an interview with the TVP reminded that on Tuesday, collected the economic Committee of the Council of Ministers and the plan of control over companies the Treasury has made certain agreements, and for discussion remained “small parts”.
“we All agree that control of companies has to be more accurate. Apart from the fact that Ministers will be driving so professional with their companies, this, however, supervision, financial and human resource oversight needs to be in the office of the President of the Council of Ministers to avoid some misunderstandings,” he stressed. Indicated that think for example, requires the head of the company between the separate departments. “Some of them are quite obvious but not so obvious; some have to think about which resort a company will take”, he said.
Kowalczyk said that the organization is a parent, placebo-controlled from outside of the State is needed, because sometimes it brings a human factor. “So if there is a second instance if such a reviewer, controller, is much more confidence that all decisions will be made with care and individuals who do not have the competence, will not be using this sieve was transferred. And we this to I was this second organization weryfikująca decisions even individual Ministers,” he explained.
he Noted that “this problem should not be”. “We want to see even such cases are individual, but inappropriate, to exclude. It is as if our mechanism for such self-cleaning. It clearly say that we want to bring in, however, was this test, so we can be sure, that was not the situation, introduced mechanisms such that there is no illegal situation”, – he noted.
the Minister also spoke about the project limitation on trading on Sunday. Indicated that it is still the government’s position in this matter. He stressed, however, that personally doesn’t consider it a bad decision, but the civil design represented in Parliament, in his opinion, requires work.
it also talked about the negotiations between the EU and Canada free trade agreement (CETA). “There are certain threats, but also from the agreement, advantages and benefits. Balancing this is not easy. Many countries in Europe ranges about such unconditional support. Here we left ourselves time for analysis. We are talking about the fact that the agreement did not worsen the situation of Poland,” he said.
According to him, the issue that requires attention is the court of the investment and definition of investment. “Here Russia should provide itself some Supreme place, not just to be a member of the European Union, where, perhaps, even the court does not have a single representative. As will be seen, for example, Russian-canadian,” said he.
he Stressed that, despite the government’s position, the final ratification of the agreement will belong to the Parliament. “We still have a lot of time on analysis of possible threats, what would have appeared,” said.
” If we are talking about the CETA agreement, but today the Parliament will debate on this topic. We also want to listen to the views of Parliament, that it was not only the decision of the government, but also the voice of Parliament. Moreover, the Parliament will be later this ratified,” he added.
the Minister reacted to the November 15 protest against CETA. “The CETA agreement is very much publicized, very controversial to treat. And perhaps even those that will come to the demonstration, will not fully understand what is referred to in this agreement,” he said.
Appreciated, however, that the agreement gives “some hope” for a good trade, for export to the territory of Canada, while also creating threats of import. “If we are talking about agricultural products is almost raised all seven years. That is a very long period of the displacement at the time of entry into force of these records. That is, if we are talking about agriculture is currently such a danger. Although, of course, in the distant future, it is necessary to reckon with”, he explained.
No comments:
Post a Comment