Management Coal Company (KW) said on Thursday concluded in July last year an agreement with the trade unions, in order to maintain conditions of employment for a year of transition to another entity.
The unions fear that it may be a prelude to a reduction in wages, or even layoffs, the Company transferred 11 mines to a new company under the name Polish Mining Group (PGG).
Smaller salaries
ZR & oacute; DLO: Shutterstock Coal Company is the largest G & oacute; rniczą sp & oacute; LKA in the coal sector
11 Coal Company mines, which are part of the restructuring will be brought … see more »
Representatives officially KW They do not comment on the case. According to unofficial information, there is no question of discharging employees, and the denunciation is to give the opportunity to moves which lead to a reduction in remuneration. Similar opinions are union representatives.
– The assumptions of the technical-economic plan for mines provide inter alia Company a drastic cut personnel costs, which does not have our permission. Termination of an agreement can be interpreted as preparation for the planned activities – said the head of Silesian Solidarity Dominik color.
The agreement of July precyzowało records prior agreement concluded between the then government and the trade unions in January last year. They agreed that the transition of employees in the so-called Coal Company. New Coal Company (now – Polish mining group) will be held in accordance with article 23 prim Labour Code, ie maintaining existing working conditions and pay.
In July, the parties agreed further that these conditions remain unchanged pending the conclusion the collective labor agreement, but no longer than a period of one year from the transfer of employees to the new entity.
The signatory of the July agreement, the company was also Węglokoks ROW (currently PGG); the termination provisions of this document by KW is also tantamount to a declaration by the company.
Changing Conditions
ZR & oacute; DLO: Coal Company SA ME: mid-year Specustawa ws. coal equivalent for retired & oacute; G & oacute; rniczych
No comments:
Post a Comment