Office of Competition and Consumer Protection initiated proceedings
on suspicion of practices infringing collective interests
consumers. They concern not used by lenders negative rates
interest rates for loans frankowych. Similar proceedings are pending against
four other banks.
The Swiss central bank in December last year once
first adopted the target rate of CHF LIBOR rate at the level of negative. In January
2015. Again lowered the target and at the same time resigned from rigid defense
exchange rate against the euro. This resulted in a sharp appreciation of the Swiss franc and was
the beginning of the subsequent turmoil around the foreign currency loans in Poland.
From the beginning, banks in different ways interpret the way
determining installments when the total rate of LIBOR plus a margin will have a value
negative. Part of the institution, in accordance with the recommendation of the PBA (the so-called. Six-pack)
temporarily (until the end of the year) takes into account the “negative interest rates” and returns
borrowers portion of installment of principal. OCCP has pledged to monitor
the behavior of banks and publishes several months statement including, inter alia this
issue.
Negative interest rates on the bone of contention
August 11 office announced that the start procedure
against Getin Noble Bank SA and Bank Pekao SA Poland which do not
They take into account the negative LIBOR, when summing up the margin gives it value
negative. According to the President of the Office such practice may constitute an unfair practice
market.
“In this case, good manners should be identified with a It is worth recalling that the negative interest rate OCCP has taken similar steps against four banks. In May Michael Kisiel
compliance with the Bank’s obligation to meet the agreements concluded with consumers
CHF loan. By placing in these agreements provisions whereby
CHF loan interest rate is the sum of the value of fixed margin and values
CHF LIBOR base rate, the Bank has committed to fixing interest rates
-described manner no matter what values take both of these factors.
Meanwhile, the Bank does not comply with the agreements established principles in a situation where in a given
Libor settlement period is negative while the value
Absolute exceeds the value of the restricted margins. The Bank assumes then that
value of CHF loan interest rate is zero. This causes adverse effects
for consumers because it leads to charge an interest rate of
higher than in the event that the Bank complied with the provisions of the loan agreements
CHF “reads the decision of the OCCP. “It should be noted that such a practice
may violate one of the fundamental principles of civil law, according to
the agreements should be kept (
sunt servanda ) “indicated in writing.
Banks
otherwise interpret the law
Polish Bank Association presents a different point of view, relying on records
in banking law stating that the loan agreement is a contract for pecuniary interest. President
OCCP in order not deny this fact, but points out that “the principle of
payment must refer to the whole of the contract period, and not to individual
accounting periods in which they are paid a single installment loan. Thus,
The Bank should take into account when calculating the interest on the loan of CHF
negative base rate LIBOR also in a situation when the absolute value of this rate
It is greater than the amount claimed in the margin loan agreement – until the sum
downloaded so far (ie. the whole current contractual period) interest
exceeds the value of the interest at the lowest possible height. “
Targeting the office was BPH and BNP Paribas, and in June mBank and ING
Bank Slaski. President of the Office may, in accordance with statutory powers, issue
decision to discontinue a practice which harms the collective interests
the consumer and the entrepreneur to provide this information to the news
the public’s expense.
No comments:
Post a Comment