The sentence harsh, but there are still questions without answers – Interfax

Because although Falenta, his assistant and two waiters illegal records ” the political scene in Poland before the court was responsible only for what was recorded without permission and without authorization transferred the phones to the media.

Court of justice verdict tightening (higher than requested by the Prosecutor), to slip in the explanation above motywacjami Falenty, who was entrusted to distribute the record. Limited by the fact that the businessman was led by “greed”. Not specifying whether we are talking about the profit of material, or can be political, that is, the change of government, which prevented Falencie in business.

at the same time, the court recognized the “stable and reliable” indications of the waiters and other witnesses. First described as Falenta persuaded them to install wiretapping and how much they paid. Others claimed that the businessman boasted that “he recorded the whole city”, and podsłuchami also used in other circumstances.

If, however, these statements are true also in those places where the waiters and witnesses describe the plans Falenty translators that through the phones, will lead to a change of government in Poland and “blow up” the interior Minister Bartholomew Sienkiewicz. “Falenta told me that next to the IPR-Ohm can arrange with President Kaczynski meeting, and that such accounts can help PiS-SARS”; “he Argued that as the “Manneken Pis” will take power, I can even get a position in government,” – said in the investigation the waiter Lukasz N.

Its wspólnikowi Falenta said that preparing a “coup” in the country, but Civic Platform needs to lose power in favor of the “Manneken Pis”, because “they all ate, and they are hungry.”

Happened the way I wanted Falenta. Sienkiewicz fired, and the scandal greatly contributed to the electoral victory of the “Manneken Pis” in 2015. Supporting this batch of media before the end of the campaign there are still phone records.

the Court did not examine further the relationship Falenty with special services. But confirmed that the businessman was an informant of the Central Bank and ABW. And that the officers received from Falenty information from the records without asking where Falenta draws its revelation.

Or service, you agree to the informant created the illegal phones? Or use agents to conduct surveillance without the court’s permission, is a new method of intelligence? Process Falenty and associates discovered only the tip of the scandal. Its broader context, then, is unknown.