Liquidation threshold from which ceases to pay social insurance, can give the budget more than two new taxes – Dziennik.pl

331.9 thousand. people. That so many of the insured in 2015. Have a high enough income that they exceeded thirty times the average wage, and thus did not have until the end of the year to pay pension contributions. Yes According to information from the Social Insurance Institution. Effect? Lower proceeds to the Fund of Social Insurance 6.2 billion zł.

In 2015. The exemption threshold was 118 770 zł. It is now even higher – 121 650 zł. It seems, however, that top earners will not be long to enjoy it.

As reported Social Insurance , has just launched verification pension adjustment. Thirtyfold the ceiling has to be one of the key issues for discussion. Other topics include the right to acquire and the amount of the minimum pension and the problem of benefit to the growing number of people who do not pay the full premiums from their income. Audit responsibility stipulated by lengthening the retirement age and introducing changes in the pension funds. Elizabeth Rafalska, minister of family, work and social policy, decided that ZUS has to be the main institution in the review.

System is to be analyzed, among others, for deficit of FUS , public debt and the amount of benefits paid. Cancellation of thirtyfold can help reduce the hole in the finances. Its abolition will make the public purse can hit more money than the IRS plans to get two new levies. As for the bank tax and the trade. Above the latter option besides just underway.

– Proposals liquidation thirtyfold were, but explained that at that time you would have to pay higher benefits – notes Alexander Wiktorow , former president of the Social Insurance Institution. He adds that it appeared the argument that the abolition of the threshold would be unfair to people who wanted to put aside more for retirement in the ZUS, but due to the reduction of contributions could not do that.

The opportunity to the changes will be the introduction of tax uniform in 2018. the details of this solution said Minister Henryk Kowalczyk, the head of the Standing Committee of the Council of Ministers, in yesterday’s interview with the DGP. According to him, tax uniform does not necessarily mean giving up thirtyfold as such – still part of the tax will be marked as a pension contribution.

Should remove the limitation of the amount of receivables without a simultaneous move away from a system in which future pensions depend from today’s payments, the future benefits some people could be very high. However, the remaining part of the single tax can be calibrated so that people with large incomes odprowadzały more appropriately to the budget. And this in turn – in theory – could to a greater extent subsidize social insurance.