@ [mention user = 1] Ripper [PL] (logged) [/mention] “out of curiosity, why kasper few trusted? Because of origin?”
Not because of ethnic origin, but because of the relationship with the former KGB. Untrusted also for this reason that Yevgeny openly admitted that it also works with other departments, even British (although in the same interview, he said that other manufacturers also work, but will not admit). There were also a lot of suspicion, officially unconfirmed no judgment, that same virus in their laboratories creates.
“unworthy of the trust are 360 (various detected machloje)”
It is not different in the plural, only one in the tests – tested version had the engine running BitDefender. This does not affect negatively on the effectiveness. This program has several motors, which can be switched on and used.
“BitDefender, in turn, has a very strange mechanisms castrated access (eg. No questions and the possibility of withdrawal of hides system files despite the” discovery “by the user, and their firewall wild” trusted “programs despite the clear prohibit in the options). “
From the first may be true, but in the second ground of something I can not believe it. Maybe odinstalowywałeś one version, then later nainstalowałeś without cleaning the registry entries?
“Comodo (proven collection and sale of data, low efficiency, little worth and extremely annoying firewall)”
It depends on what was agreed during the installation. Antivirus so-so, but the firewall one of the best (if upierdliwość is a disadvantage? In the end it comes to safety.).
“The rest of those not tested”
The network has a lot of testing, I recommend the “real time protection” instead of those samples.
Webroot has the advantage that it is kind to the resources. Avira has a high efficiency, even in the free version annoy solicitation, and the module responsible for it by other programs detected as a threat.
As for Avast … remember how long we had to wait until it starts to remove even the famous “Polizja Komorowski.”
No comments:
Post a Comment