Rafalsky: does Not have permissions to require statements ws. withdrawals from the “500 +” – GazetaPrawna.pl

on Thursday, the resort of the family and work and said that the Minister Rafalsky in connection “with the message telepaths in demand from employees for the submission of withdrawal from a program +Family 500 plus+ under the threat of dismissal” asked the Chief Labour Inspector on inspection Auchan and transmission of the report control.

Director of communications, ” Auchan Russia Retail Dorothy Patejko noted that it is not that these statements are collected from all employees, under duress, or for any other purpose.

“do Not have permission nor approval. It is unacceptable to the employer necessarily required to file such statements,” she said Rafalsky in a conversation with PAP.

she Admitted that the social benefits Fund is an internal affair of the company. “These rules are internal regulator, prepared jointly with the trade Union organizations, with staff taken at the enterprise”, – said the Minister of work. According to her, wliczanie or niewliczanie benefits “Family” 500 plus” to income should be done with employees and trade unions.

Rafalsky noted, however, that the provision of “Family” 500 plus” is not included in income when calculating social assistance benefits. “The intention of the legislator was to support families in the upbringing of children, and not a limitation of her income,” she said.

As written Patejko in the message, according to RAHR, “Auchan” respects the rights, defining the rules of functioning of the Social Fund. Noticed that “employees who want to use the benefits of a Social Fund, constitute its request to the Members of the Social Committee, together with the voluntary Declaration of income, based on family member”.

Another opinion on the matter is Dariusz Paczuski from the Solidarity trade UNION, who told REUTERS that workers address, to whom the employer “threatened negative effects” if you do not sign a certificate ws. funding from the program “Family 500 plus”. He added that if Auchan will not want to speak on this subject, and to change its position, different actions are available, including shares protestacyjnymi. In the evaluation of “S”, all programs “500 plus” should not be included in income.

In MRPiPS, detailed rules of the disbursement of the Fund, including the method of determining the situation of social persons who are eligible for subsidies, is subject to regulation by contract. Noticed that this also applies to counting or nieuwzględniania benefits for child care “500 plus” in the family income of an employee owner who requests the provision of social Fund.(PAP)